Thursday, March 9, 2017

Court Rules "Informational" Letters Did Not Violate Discharge

By Stephen W. Sather
Barron & Newburger, P.C.
Austin, Texas

A recurring problem in bankruptcy is how lenders can provide information about a debt to a borrower without violating the discharge or the automatic stay.    In some cases the borrower may wish to continue making payments and would appreciate receiving payment notices.   In other cases, the lender may be required to send notices to the borrower in order to comply with state laws governing foreclosures.    In these cases, lenders must walk a fine line between conveying information and coercively seeking to collect a debt.   In re Roth, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28710 (M.D. Fl. 2017) illustrates how to send a notice that does not violate the Bankruptcy Code.


In Roth, the Debtor filed a chapter 13 proceeding and confirmed a plan.  Under the plan, the Debtor elected to surrender real property securing a debt owed to BAC Home Loan Servicing.   The debt was subsequently transferred to Nationstar.  After the Debtor completed her plan and received a discharge, Nationstar began sending statements to the Debtor.   The Debtor brought both a motion for sanctions for violation of the discharge and a suit under the FDCPA.  The Bankruptcy Court denied the motion for sanctions, finding that the “Informational Statement” did not constitute an attempt to collect a debt.    The case was then appealed to the U.S. District Court which affirmed the Bankruptcy Court’s denial of sanctions.

Key to the Court’s ruling was a disclaimer in bold type on the top of the first page stating:
This statement is sent for informational purposes only and is not intended to collect, assess, or recover a discharged debt from you, or as a demand for payment from any individuals protected by the United States Bankruptcy Code. If this account is active or has been discharged in a bankruptcy proceeding, be advised this communication is for informational purposes only and is not an attempt to collect a debt. Please note, however Nationstar reserves the right to exercise its legal rights, including but not limited to foreclosure of its lien interest, only against the property security the original obligation.
 Included with the letter was a payment coupon labeled “Voluntary Payment Coupon.”   The Bankruptcy Court noted that the Bankruptcy Code contemplates that a Debtor may choose to make voluntary payments on a discharged debt and that the lender could make some contact with the Debtor so long as the communication did not amount to an attempt to collect a debt.

On appeal, the Debtor argued that in the related action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), the Court found that the “Informational Statement” was an attempt to collect a debt. However, the District Court distinguished the standards under the FDCPA and the Bankruptcy Code.  Under the FDCPA, the test is whether the “least sophisticated consumer” would interpret the statement as an attempt to collect a debt. The inquiry in bankruptcy, however, is whether the communication was an actual attempt to collect a debt.

The District Court also rejected the Debtor’s argument that the Bankruptcy Court should have conducted a hearing to determine the lender’s intent in sending the “Informational Statement.”   The Court found that subjective intent was not relevant to whether the specific conduct violated the discharge.   As a result, the District Court affirmed the Bankruptcy Court’s ruling.

The decision provides two main takeaways.   The first is that a prominently placed disclaimer such as the one in this case can keep a communication from turning into an attempt to collect a debt (at least under the Bankruptcy Code).   However, it is important to consider the totality of the circumstances.    Had the notice been placed on the back of the letter or if the payment coupon had not said “voluntary” on it, the result could have been different.

The second takeaway is that the same conduct may have different consequences under the Bankruptcy Code and the FDCPA.  In the separate case under the FDCPA, the District Court found that the allegation that the least sophisticated consumer might be misled by the Informational Statement was plausible enough to state a cause of action.  Of course, the fact that the Complaint stated a cause of action does not mean that the Debtor will ultimately prevail.  Nevertheless, it is significant that the same letter led to different results under the two statutory schemes.


6 comments:

  1. Well ! I am very much thankful to you for writing on topic of my interest. Your blog is a great source of information. Keep writing.tucson bankruptcy attorney

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Everybody,
      My name is Ahmad Asnul Brunei, I contacted Mr Osman Loan Firm for a business loan amount of $250,000, Then i was told about the step of approving my requested loan amount, after taking the risk again because i was so much desperate of setting up a business to my greatest surprise, the loan amount was credited to my bank account within 24 banking hours without any stress of getting my loan. I was surprise because i was first fall a victim of scam! If you are interested of securing any loan amount & you are located in any country, I'll advise you can contact Mr Osman Loan Firm via email osmanloanserves@gmail.com

      LOAN APPLICATION INFORMATION FORM
      First name......
      Middle name.....
      2) Gender:.........
      3) Loan Amount Needed:.........
      4) Loan Duration:.........
      5) Country:.........
      6) Home Address:.........
      7) Mobile Number:.........
      8) Email address..........
      9) Monthly Income:.....................
      10) Occupation:...........................
      11)Which site did you here about us.....................
      Thanks and Best Regards.
      Whats app) +917290857361
      Derek Email osmanloanserves@gmail.com

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. According to an international finance group, agriculture is a major source of livelihood throughout the world, especially for the majority of poor people living in rural areas in developing countries. A key challenge for the majority of these farmers is access to finance. Lack of access to finance is a key impediment to farmers in improving the efficiency of their productions and adopting better technologies. So, to have a better understanding about agricultural finance is a very important thing to the farmers or other people that may relate to it in their daily life. So that, after reading this artikel, we may have the understanding about the financial concepts and the practical applications of finance that is essential for anyone, especially the important managerial problems in agriculture that involve finance.
    Contact pedroloanss@gmail.com for agricultural loans and other kinds of loans at the rate of 2%

    ReplyDelete
  5. Awesome resources A phoenix dui lawyer is not only stressful and frightening because it’s not just your criminal record on the line. A DUI charge and subsequent conviction can leave you without an Arizona driver’s license, in addition to the imposition of potential jail time, probation and costly fines.

    ReplyDelete